Sources checked: October 20, 2026. Public product and service information changes; confirm current scope directly with each provider.
Public information
What does Simply Voting describe publicly?
The points below summarize selected statements from Simply Voting’s own public pages. They are not a complete capabilities assessment, a legal conclusion, or a statement about what is included in a particular contract.
- Simply Voting describes both self-service online voting and managed elections with a dedicated project manager.
- Simply Voting describes online, telephone, and paper or mail-in ballot options; confirm which channels and services are included for the election you are planning.
- Simply Voting says its managed elections can provide results, an audit trail, and other required reports.
- Simply Voting states that it holds a SOC 2 Type I report and that its voting interface is regularly audited against WCAG 2.1 accessibility requirements.
- Simply Voting currently states 17–18 voter-interface translations across its public pages; confirm the current number for your election.
- Simply Voting states that support representatives are on call at all hours; confirm the voter-support model for your election.
Buyer evaluation
What should an election buyer ask each provider?
A useful comparison starts with the election—not a generic feature checklist. Give each provider the same rules, voter scenario, documentation needs, and acceptance tests, then ask for written answers and evidence.
- Which voting channels, service model, and election timeline are included for this election?
- Which governing-document, accessibility, security, records, and support requirements must the provider address?
- What implementation work is included, excluded, or subject to custom scope?
- Which election records, reports, and result-delivery materials will be available to the organization?
Use Votem’s election services RFP checklist to turn those questions into a written evaluation process.